Re: USAGE: THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break
From: | Roger Mills <romilly@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, May 7, 2002, 19:35 |
Tristan wrote:
>And Rosta wrote:
>
> > As for the (immaterial, I think) question "has > Aust. phonemicized
> > length in other, non-r, environments?", try _foot:fought_
>
>/fUt/:/fO:t/? Nothing alike!
Jumping in temporarily: that's what I thought, too. How about:
rot : wrought
cot : caught ( and _court_??)
sot : sought (sort???)
not : nought/naught (north???)
et al.
Replies