Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Three vowel systems (was: Brr)

From:John Vertical <johnvertical@...>
Date:Friday, August 3, 2007, 7:05
>Joseph Fatula wrote: >> T. A. McLeay wrote: > >>> Do I read you right in claiming a vowel system comprised of /i: i I: I >>> 1: 1/? Is there an anadew for that? >> >> It contains those sounds, yes. I'm not sure whether to call the last >> vowel /1/ or /E/, it seems like it's somewhere in between those when I'm >> pronouncing it. > >[1] and [E] aren't exactly nearby sounds unless you're using [1] to mean >something other than a high central unrounded vowel i.e. IPA [ɨ]. >"Somewhere in between" would be something like [@] or [I].
IMHO [7] or [V] sound a bit like " a mix of [i\] and [E]", especially if the unrounding (lip spreding) is emphasized.
>>Is this a very strange system? It seems like Hungarian >> has one about as complex. > >I have never heard of a language that has all of /i: i I: I/; indeed, my >understanding is it's unheard of! Hungarian has a fairly boring system: >/i: i y: y e: E 2: 2 Q A: o: o u: u/, some dialects also having /e/ (and >all of /e: E e/ are quite low for those IPA symbols). > >Icelandic has /i I/ with two allophones each: [i: I:] in open syllables, >[i I] in closed ones. But this is part of a regular/systematic process >and is clearly allophonic; it is, however, the closest I know. > >-- >Tristan.
There are some African langs that have both ATR/RTR and short/long vowel distinctions, which results in /i i: I I:/. For one example, take Somali: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somali_phonology 'Fcors an ATR [i] vs RTR [I] distinction is not exactly the same as a plain [i I] distinction, but I dout we're going to find anything better. John Vertical

Reply

T. A. McLeay <conlang@...>