Re: USAGE: Thorn vs Eth
From: | John Cowan <jcowan@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, July 9, 2002, 14:28 |
tim talpas scripsit:
> Though I think that "thy" isn't a very good example, as I don't hear
> that word spoken ever. (maybe in some british dialects I don't know about?)
Protestant Christians say "Hallowed be thy name" rather frequently; I admit
it's not a word used in conversation much.
> Or maybe words of Norse origin? Either works, I guess, though I don't know
> the etymology of "though". (akin to icelandic /ToU/ ?)
No, no: the, this, that, these, those are all native words. Only they,
their, them are Norse.
> "with it" [wID It]... but "with hat" [wIT h&t]
But "pith" remains [T] in either case; this is lexically specific.
> without [wITaUt]
I say that one with /D/.
--
John Cowan <jcowan@...>
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan http://www.reutershealth.com
Common Gaelic in Cyrillic script!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Celticonlang
John Cowan <jcowan@...>
http://www.reutershealth.com http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
.e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
Please support Lojban! http://www.lojban.org
Reply