Re: Latin <h>
From: | Nik Taylor <yonjuuni@...> |
Date: | Monday, January 12, 2004, 3:24 |
Christophe Grandsire wrote:
> I doubt it. In some dialects (Gasconic dialects IIRC), the f > h went all
> the way, including in front of [w] ("fire" is "huek" there).
A universal doesn't mean something MUST occur or MUST NOT occur, only
that there is a preference for it to occur or not to occur. Of course,
two examples of /f/ -> /h/ being blocked isn't exactly strong evidence
even for a universal tendency. :-)
--
"There's no such thing as 'cool'. Everyone's just a big dork or nerd,
you just have to find people who are dorky the same way you are." -
overheard
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTaylor42