Re: Naming the conlang
From: | Tristan Mc Leay <kesuari@...> |
Date: | Monday, July 12, 2004, 6:27 |
Philip Newton wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:24:59 +1000, Tristan Mc Leay
> <kesuari@...> wrote:
>
>>In Modern Etábnanni, the _e--nanni_ had been
>>re-analysed as an outfix
>
>
> More commonly known as a "circumfix", I believe.
>
> At any rate, I'd never heard "outfix" before.
Neither had I :) I had no other idea of what to call it, but it seemed
reasonable given that you have infixes and in is the opposite of out...
--
Tristan. | To be nobody-but-yourself in a world
kesuari at yahoo!.com.au | which is doing its best to, night and day,
| to make you everybody else---
| means to fight the hardest battle
| which any human being can fight;
| and never stop fighting.
| --- E. E. Cummings, "A Miscellany"