Re: ADMIN: Conlang welcome message

Quoting Costentin Cornomorus <elemtilas@...>:

> --- Dirk Elzinga <dirk_elzinga@...> wrote:
>
> > X-SAMPA may be the de facto standard, but I
> > don't recall any statement
> > regarding X-SAMPA as the "official
> > transcription system of CONLANG"
> > having been made, so I don't think that adding
> > this to the CONLANG
> > welcome message would be appropriate.
>
> Agreed; and aren't most messages in a modified
> ASCIIfication anyway? I seem to recall that [&]
> for ash and [@] for schwa aren't X-SAMPA?
Act'ly, [@] for schwa is orthodox SAMPA and X-SAMPA.

In the later, [&] is low front rounded (IPA small caps OE ligature) - IIRC,
it's undefined in unextended SAMPA.

                                                             Andreas