Re: Lax counterpart of [&]?

Staving Mark J. Reed:
>On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 05:15:59PM -0400, Isidora Zamora wrote:
> > I (Isidora) was not the original enquirer.
>
>Oh, whoops.  Sorry.
>
> > I am pretty new to the list and had no idea
> > that most people used & to represent ash.  Now I know.
>
>See this chart, which someone (Tristan, I believe?) was nice enough to
>create, showing the deviances from X-SAMPA that are common on
>here:
>
>http://cassowary.free.fr/Linguistics/cxschart.png
>
>The system, which he dubbed CXS, is almost identical with X-SAMPA.
>The main substitutions are [&] for [{] and [u\] for [}], to
>avoid punctuation, and [i\] for [1], because the latter is
>indistinguishable from [l] in many fonts (it's nearly so in the
>one I'm using).
 From this cart it would appear reasonable for [&] to lax to [3] while [a]
laxes to [6] that would make my original Magikimnaz case system

         sing            plu
Nom     --              [(j)6:]
Acc     [kU],[gU]       [gwU]
Gen     [(j)Uz]         [z6:],[s6:]
Dat     [(j)3k]         [g6:],[k6:]
Ade     [(j)Ut]         [tU:],[dU:]
Ine     [(j)Ip]         [p6:],[b6:]
All     [(j)3m]         [(j)3m:3]
Ins     [(j)Ol]         [(j)O3l]
Voc     [jE]            [(j)EU]

Pete