En réponse à Peter Bleackley <Peter.Bleackley@...>:
>
> This is all adding weight to the argument that TeX/LaTeX and Metafont
> comprise the only practical system for conlanging.
And the reason for the existence of the Latex-for-Conlangers group ;))) .
Although this one is quite silent lately...
> There are two types of computer programs - those written on the
> assumption
> that you know what you want to do, and those written on the assumption
> that
> the programmer knows what you want to do. LaTeX belongs firmly in the
> former camp. However, as I discovered while writing my Ph.D. thesis,
> "Those
> who've learned LaTeX swear by it. Those who are learning LaTeX swear at
> it."
>
LOL. I know what you mean :)) . I was lucky enough to learn LaTeX while writing
my report during my internship at Philips, and they provided a template for it.
So I learned the soft way :)) . Later, I went more into it though.
Christophe.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
It takes a straight mind to create a twisted conlang.