Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: THEORY: vowel harmony [was CHAT: Another NatLang i like]

From:Matt Pearson <mpearson@...>
Date:Monday, June 28, 1999, 6:43
>At 5:45 pm +0200 27/6/99, Kristian Jensen wrote: >>Raymond Brown wrote: >>-----<snip>----- >>>Maybe all I should've written was: "How is that different from nasal >>>spread?" >> >>That's essentially what I meant to say as well. :-) > >[snip] >>> >>>Maybe not much - but in the first example the initial _consonant_ is >>>changed to harmonize. I see no evidence in the example above of a fronting >>>or palatalization of any of the Mongolian consonants, tho certainly all the >>>consonants are capable of being so modified. >> >>I think this also depends on how narrowly one wants to transcribe >>languages. In English for instance, words like "keel" and "cool" are >>normally phonemically transcribed in the IPA as /kil/ and /kul/, >[etc snipped] > >I had a feeling you might answer like that :-) > >> >>Again, how is that different from nasal spread? > >Dunno - once thought I did :=( > >Matt?
Well, I had basically dropped out of this thread, but since I've been called by name, I'll drop back in again. Forgive me if I say anything incoherent: I've been celebrating the beginning of summer by getting sloshed on Sangria, and my head is a little light... When I originally invoked the notion of nasal spread, I meant the spread of nasalisation from a nasal consonant to the surrounding vowels. In Mixtec, for example, when a word begins with a nasal consonant, all of the following vowels in the word will be nasalised, unless there's a non-nasal, non-glottal consonant somewhere in the word, in which case that consonant will block further spreading. (We have a less interesting kind of nasal spread in English, where a vowel becomes nasalised if followed by a syllable-final nasal consonant.) What I was asking for (with a certain dubious tone in my voice) was a language with a *phonemic* contrast between oral and nasal vowels, in which all of the vowels in a word must be either oral or nasal. In such a language, /katima/ and /ka~ti~ma~/ would be possible words, but /kati~ma/, /ka~tima~/, /katima~/, etc., would not be possible words. That, as I see it, would be an example of nasal vowel harmony, and would be quite a different phenomenon from nasal spread, which involves the interaction of a nasal consonant and an adjacent vowel (or vowels). Matt. ------------------------------------ Matt Pearson mpearson@ucla.edu UCLA Linguistics Department 405 Hilgard Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90095-1543 ------------------------------------