Re: Poll: What looks best?
| From: | Paul Bennett <paul.w.bennett@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Thursday, July 5, 2007, 15:31 |
|---|
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:01:29 -0400, taliesin the storyteller
<taliesin-conlang@...> wrote:
> And here are the candidates:
>
> maHavvel H kanra Hāen oHamigh Hu khaHa Hetuaþ Heìes
> mařavvel ř kanra řāen ořamigh řu khařa řetuaþ řeìes
> maяavvel я kanra яāen oяamigh яu khaяa яetuaþ яeìes
> maħavvel ħ kanra ħāen oħamigh ħu khaħa ħetuaþ ħeìes
> maгavvel г kanra гāen oгamigh гu khaгa гetuaþ гeìes
Of those options, I'd go for r-caron, absent any significant understanding
of the conhistory of the romanisation.
If you're going to accept Cyrillic and other outlanders, how about these:
maƣavvel ƣ kanra ƣāen oƣamigh ƣu khaƣa ƣetuaþ ƣeìes
maнavvel н kanra нāen oнamigh нu khaнa нetuaþ нeìes
In the latter case, I'm implying casing pairs like H/н and Һ/h for /ʀ͡r/ ~
/ɧʳ/ (or whatever is) and /h/.
CXS? Hmm... I think /R_r/ and /x\^r/ are the equivalents of my guesses
above.
Do you have an existing {q} in the orthography? That's a pretty common and
generic symbol for "other".
maqavvel q kanra qāen oqamigh qu khaqa qetuaþ qeìes
Paul
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Reply