Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
| From: | Herman Miller <hmiller@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Sunday, October 11, 1998, 0:57 |
|---|
On Sat, 10 Oct 1998 15:23:54 +0000, Charles <catty@...> wrote:
>What I'd like would be a sort of ontological
>tree as in WordNet, grouping the near-infinite
>nouns into a tree of sub-categories, a taxonomy.
>The higher-level words would be the essentials
>of a "reasonable" vocabulary. Maybe just 2000
>or so well-chosen words is enough? Anyway,
>it would be a good list to re-lex from.
I think it's too early for mass vocabulary-generation. Starting small is =
a
good idea. I'd like to avoid relexing, especially from English.