Re: Etabnannimizing Tsiressa Orthography
|From:||Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>|
|Date:||Monday, February 3, 2003, 22:10|
En réponse à Shreyas Sampat <ssampat@...>:
> Dritaa iwtanh kamaadh, yseyniid tosqsirat avjutud...
> ...ya, tuyniide ysewsirat tann, pvetsa tosqsirat sin inuut mun ysedah!
> /drit:3 1da:n k3m:ad: s\IJid: tUst1rat 3\vJ\}tud
> ja t1J:idI s\Iz1rat t:an bISta tUst1rat sin 1n:ut mun s\Idah/
Well, the system looks good, very Etabnannimous. It even uses some of the
principles of the "regular" parts of Maggel orthography (like prefixed
digraphs). I like it so far, though I don't really have much to comment on it,
except that it looks definitely naturalistic, the kind of orthography that
would arise after three or four centuries without spelling reforms :) .
Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.
PS: the Reply-To field was filled with your address instead of the one of the
list. I nearly sent this mail only to you...