Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Lexicons and Langauge Borrowing

From:FFlores <fflores@...>
Date:Tuesday, March 16, 1999, 2:30
Michael Mouatt <arcangel@...> wrote:
> > I would like to form geopolitical, cultural, and religious labels from a > lexicon by using etymology; ie. followers of, village of, etc. Do I > require grammar structures for this purpose?
The structures you need may or may not be grammatical. You could certainly have a set of grammatical inflections for nouns that transform them into the things you mentioned. But these need not be included in the standard grammar of the language. You can create a set of affixes to attach them to words. These affixes might be very productive (like English -er, -or for agents, -ian, -ese for nationalities). I recommend affixes (or other devices) to modify words. You can have several affixes for a single function like this, and you can also produce irregularities as your language changes, thus obscuring the primitive derivation, and avoiding sets of words that look very much alike.
> > Also, is it considered bad form to borrow too much from real languages?
Bad according to who? There are no dogmas here :-)
> I'm creating some conlangs based on the Scandanavian and Germanic > branches. So far I've borrowed heavily from Icelandic phonology. >
Borrowing phonology can't be bad -- Tolkien did this all the time. Sindarin is ostensibly modelled after Welsh, and Quenya has a strong influence from Finnish. In a way, almost all conlangs borrow phonology from natlangs. No one has created a language with sounds that aren't present in some natlang, unless it's intended for aliens. Borrowing a lot of phonemes from one natlang only makes it look similar to it at first sight, and often more realistic. Borrowing words (lexicon) from natlangs is another thing. I wouldn't judge anybody who does that (anybody in the list?). You might borrow words if you are deriving a futuristic language based on an actual language. I don't do that, and don't borrow words from any natlang, at least at a conscious level. But I don't see that could be bad from any point of view (unless you really borrow *a lot*). If you're deriving a new language that could have evolved from Germanic or Scandinavian, then you sure have to take those as a base for lexicon. --Pablo Flores * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Stewart's Law of Retroaction: It is easier to get forgiveness than permission.