Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Latin vowel inventory

From:Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>
Date:Wednesday, July 30, 2003, 4:32
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 09:39:52PM -0400, Christopher Wright wrote:
> Hello. > > I was reading a TY (Teach Yourself) Latin book and looked at the > pronunciation section. This is what it said, converted to SAMPA, of course: > > (left indicates "long" vowel, right indicates "short" vowel) > a /A/, /@/ > e /e/ (or /ej/), /E/ > i /i/, /I/ > o /o/, /A/ > u /u/, /U/ > y /y/
Note that there are several ways to pronounce Latin, all of them accepted for various purposes. In modern times most instructors teach the reconstructed classical pronunciation, which represents our best estimate of how the Romans pronounced Classical Latin during the time of Cicero (I recommend W. Sidney Allen's excellent book _Vox_Latina_ for discussion of the reconstruction and pronunciation guidelines). However, for centuries it was customary to pronounce Latin as if it were the local dominant language, so in England Latin was pronounced as if it were English, in Italy as if it were Italian, etc. The English pronunciation survives in many borrowings, and is used for almost all Latin in the legal and medical professions. The Italian pronunciation was adopted by the Roman Catholic Church and is today often called the Ecclesiastical Pronunciation. In it, the short/long vowel distinction is not made at all. In the reconstructed classical pronunciation, your list above is mostly correct. The long <e> is definitely /e/ and not /ej/, just as long <o> is /o/ and not /ow/, which right there is a noticeable difference from English. The long vowels were actually quantitatively longer as well, probably by a factor of 1.5 or so. The qualitative difference between short and long <a> is a matter of some debate, with some folks arguing that there was none at all. But most agree that there was, giving the short <a> one of the values /@/, /V/, or /6/. Also note that (going back to the Classical pronunciation) <c> is always /k/; <ch> is /k_h/; <g> is always /g/; <th> and <ph> are /t_h/ and /p_h/, not /T/ and /f/. The <r> is always rolled /r/, not just a tap /4/. And <z> is /dz/. Other than some devoicing clusters (e.g. <urbs> sounds like <urps>), I think that's about it for differences from English consonants. -Mark

Reply

Tristan McLeay <zsau@...>