Re: Universal Translation Language
From: | Joshua Shinavier <ajshinav@...> |
Date: | Monday, May 31, 1999, 9:00 |
Charles wrote:
> In my experiments it seems impossible to have part-of-speech terminal
> vowels and SVO order without eventually gravitating to adjective-noun.
Aroven uses terminal vowels and -VC suffixes for all parts of speech
except the subject (although the subject often gets a suffix as well,
'specially if it's plural, or has an article, etc.) and is firmly
noun-adjective. The language lies somewhere between SVO and VSO.
E.g.
SVO:
Piidel tinde halka fyarden. (ii =3D i", ee =3D e")
child little trips [over a] piece of wood.
VSO:
In halka piidel tinde.
Happens-that trips child little.
=20
In my language, adjective-noun seems very awkward, so I'm wondering how
you came to the above conclusion!
Inversion is possible but alters the meaning somewhat:
Piidel tinde halka =3D=3D a kid who is little trips (is tripping)
Tindye piidel halka =3D=3D a (little-kid) trips. The "little" is in this
case especially essential to the subject.
=20
Josh
=20
_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/ Joshua Shinavier =20
_/ _/ _/ Loorenstrasse 74, Zimmer B321=20
_/ _/ _/_/_/_/ CH-8053 Z=FCrich =20
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ Switzerland =20
_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ jshinavi@g26.ethz.ch
Danov=EBn pages: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Crete/5555/ven.htm