| From: | Bryan Maloney <bjm10@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wednesday, May 26, 1999, 22:50 |
On Wed, 26 May 1999, Marcos Franco wrote:> 1. Being unambiguous (or unambiguous enough), which make it suitable > for good quality machine translation (from it) and other computational > issues, and for scientific, philosophical and linguistical purposes.I suggest you read the entire corpus of Wittgenstein, from the beginning to end of his career. Then consider this question of ambiguity.