Re: THEORY: Conlangs?

On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 11:24:41PM -0700, Douglas Treadwell wrote:
> Is anyone here currently building a conlang?
I've been working on Tatari Faran on and off. Though with my current
schedule, not that much is happening.

I do consider the grammar to be already serviceable, though, so the most
immediate goal right now is to build the lexicon. (Which seems to be the
stumbling block of so many conlangers.)


> Is anyone interested in a collaborative effort to develop a conlang?
What kind of conlang do you have in mind?


> I have a few thoughts about how to resolve the issues that usually
> slow down progress on collaborative projects.
[...]

Interested to hear more.


--T