Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
From: | Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, July 12, 2006, 6:32 |
On 7/12/06, Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> wrote:
> If I were making one of these, I'd use <a> = /&/,/a/ (losing that
> distinction in spelling), <u> = /U/,/V/ (ibid). <ay>=/ai/, <e>=/E/,
> <ey>=/ei/, <i>=/I/, <iy>=/i/, <o>=/O/, <ow>=/o/ (vs current "Ow!"
> which is <aw>). The -y in <ey> and <iy> and the -w in <ow> could be
> optional when final.
Also, <uw> for /u/ with the same optional final -w rule. I overlooked
that and spelled "moving" as "muving" instead of "muwving" in my last
message.
--
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>