Re: Questions Concerning Grammar
From: | Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 15:01 |
From: John Leland <Lelandconlang@...>
In a message dated 7/30/04 9:58:55 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
trwier@UCHICAGO.EDU writes:
> << 'm more familiar with the way topicality works in Korean. There,
> the topic marker and the subject marker are in complimentary
> distribution. You can mark the subject as topic, or as subject,
> but not both. Thus:
>
> (a) They-TOP saw the dog-ABS and ___ ran.
> (b) They-ERG saw the dog-ABS and ___ ran.
> (c) *They-TOP-ERG saw the dog-ABS and ___ ran.
>
> (Korean's nom/acc, but you get the idea.) >>
>
> To increase the understanding of someone who knows some Korean but
> is less familiar with linguistic terminology,could you put those
> sentences,or at least the markers, into Korean?
IIRC:
(a) They-nun the dog-lul saw and (they) ran.
(b) They-ka the dog-lul saw and (they) ran.
(c) *They-ka-nun the dog-lul saw and (they) ran.
=========================================================================
Thomas Wier "I find it useful to meet my subjects personally,
Dept. of Linguistics because our secret police don't get it right
University of Chicago half the time." -- octogenarian Sheikh Zayed of
1010 E. 59th Street Abu Dhabi, to a French reporter.
Chicago, IL 60637