Re: TECH: dumb html question

On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Mark J. Reed wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 12:52:45PM -0500, jcowan@REUTERSHEALTH.COM wrote:
> > Mark J. Reed scripsit:
> >
> > > But in both Mozilla Firebird 0.7 and IE 6.1, not only does this not cause
> > > &schwa to be recognized, it doesn't even parse correctly.  The >
> > > that closes the <!ENTITY> tag is interpreted as closing the whole <!DOCTYPE>
> > > tag, with the result that the ]> appear as content in the page.
> >
> > This works fine in Firebird if you force XHTML interpretation: for example, if you
> > use a local file with the extension .xhtml or .xml.
>
> Hm.  When I did that it stopped treating it as HTML at all; the entity
> was expanded, but the content was just dumped as plain text with no
> formatting, including the <title> which showed up in the browser's
> rendering of the page.  I named it '.xhtml', too, not '.xml'.
Hmm... well, try <http://zsau.firespeaker.org/frog.php>. It's working fine
for me (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031125
Galeon/1.3.11a).


--
Tristan

Reply