>
>Founylorjykyl Englix
>Fdnyldjikyl Inglyx
>
>Does Your version still disagree with mine?
>
>Unfortunately, yes.
>
>I have
>
>Founylorjykyl Inglix
>(foh-nuh-lodj-uh-kuhl ing-glish)
>Isn't your suggestion of ...
>
>> Regional dialects would either slowly vanish or adopt non-official
>> spellings of their own.
>
>... (a significant factor in) how we came to our current fudged-up english
>orthography to begin with?
>
>You have laudable aims and I want to help if I can, but I fear that finding a
solution that actually works significantly better than the mishmash currently in
>use (including general acceptance by the public) may be beyond our grasp.
Well I agree that it won't be taking over English any time soon, but
possibly it would be used by novelists. At least I hope so as I recoil
at reading dialectical spellings, Mark Twain etc is a pain for me. I
have a friend who wrote a whole novel with dialectical english, it's
good to read for sense and flavor but those alarm bells of "spelling
eror!" keep going off in my head and I can't concentrate on the
narrative. It should be great for poetry as well. The images will still
be there undistorted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry | Without careful communication
Gerald Lea Koenig | jlkatnetcomdotcom There is boundless demonization.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>*************************************************************
>This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
>and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
>to whom they are addressed.
>If you have received this email in error please notify the
>sender. This footnote also confirms that this email message
>has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses.
>*************************************************************
>