Re: TRANS.: nat-&-conlang "googolgigglabyte"
From: | Dan Sulani <dnsulani@...> |
Date: | Monday, July 15, 2002, 9:29 |
On 14 July, J Y S Czhang wrote:
> HiYa conlang peeps *
> For my "translations listing" of _googolgigglabyte_ in one of my
> sig.lines, so far I have:
>
> googolgigglabyte goegolgiechelbijt googolriderbyte
> googolspassoctet
> ^ English ^Dutch ^Interlingua (?) ^Italian,
> slang version
>
> I would like a bunch more natlang, auxlang and conlang "specimens" to
> display/show-off ;)
Well, in rtemmu, it could be: (Please remove all chewing gum from your mouth
and swallow your saliva! ;-) ):
tuktukt'ishushukuko`g tuk go`go`o`gwgaga
(tuktuk-t'i-shushukuk-o`g-tuk go`go`-o`g-wgaga)
o` = [O]; ' = glotttal stop; sh = [S];
tuktuk = 2 (base 8; in rtemmu numbers have different names in base 10 and in
base 8)
t'i = to the power of
shushukuk = 8 (base 8)
o`g = compounding particle
tuk = 1 (base 8)
thus
tuktukt'ishushukuko`g tuk = byte ( 2 to the power of 8 as a unitary
process)
go`go` = googol (I confess: I just made up this word; chose the phonology to
fit in with the overall "music" of the phrase ;-) )
wgaga = the process of giggling
Of course, all that is without the rate-of-change marker! It should
probably be "subjective", but at what rate? Let's use an accelerating
fast rate of change, |utne| and we'll also need to stress that it is an
emotional exclamation, thus putting |va'i| ahead of the whole thing.
So, for _googolgigglabyte_ as a crazed byte of mind-giggle:
va'i utne tuktukt'ishushukuko`g tuk go`go`o`gwgaga!
Dan Sulani
----------------------------------------------------------
likehsna rtem zuv tikuhnuh auag inuvuz vaka'a
A word is an awesome thing.