Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: OT: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...

From:Joe <joe@...>
Date:Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 16:45
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Johansson" <andjo@...>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...


> Quoting "H. S. Teoh" <hsteoh@...>: > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:26:00PM +0200, Andreas Johansson wrote: > > [snip] > > > g0miileg0's orthography isn't among the most aesthetically appealing > > > I've seen, but beyond the use of "0" as a letter there's nothing much
I
> > > actively dislike. Pete's system, OTOH, includes stuff like _euohfv_, > > > which makes French look downright stunning by comparison. > > [snip] > > > > You think that's bad? the ASCII transcription of Ebisedian is worse. > > Unconsciably ugly, as Jesse Bangs says. :-) As an example, take the > > following text: > > > > tww'ma esa'ni erosa'ni t3 > > zota' katou' ke. > > zota' cutou' ce. > > zota' rotou' re. > > keve ta'ma ebu' n3 Ta'l3n di gh3'. > > t3m3t3 > > my'nac3 katui' ke. > > my'nac3 cutui' ce. > > my'nac3 rotui' re. > > Ta'lin. kil3 icu'ro bis33'di. > > t3m3. > > Beyond the atrocious use of "3" as a letter, I don't think that's even
close
> to the terribleness of Peter's system.
ohfv tkeuoh it ihv! wbveuotqh weuonkv wbvihdv hdvih hihteynb, eniiwbvei? tvhxveuht tbveytkeuhv it wlviyotkh hfveitkvwlvii wlvauitk tvhxvitbveywvihx... Incidentally, it's a lot easier to write that to read.. 'it' I note, remains unchanged.
> Andreas >

Reply

Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>