Re: Tolkien's elfish script (was: Re: demuan identifiers re-visited)
From: | wayne chevrier <wachevrier@...> |
Date: | Monday, August 30, 1999, 21:43 |
>From: Fabian <rhialto@...>
>l-gharef Eric hu kiteb
>
> > Actually, Devanagari and other Brahmi-derived scripts such as Tibetan
>are
> > the same way. Like Tengwar, each consonant has its own basic shape, and
>the
> > vowels are added as diacritics. Also, Devanagari characters without any
> > vowel marking default to /a/, whereas marking /a/ is optional in Quenya.
>
>Good point. Personally, I regard most indic scrpts as being separate from
>true syllabaries, as each glyph has a default vowel sound. glyphs for other
>CV combos are made with diacritics, unlike true syllabaries which have
>totally different glyphs.
>
One classification I have seen is:
Abjad - consonantal script e.g. Arabic, Hebrew
vowels not marked or marked with optional diacritics
Abugida - Indic and Ethiopic scripts
vowel included as part of composable characters
a vowel included in the base form
Syllabary - Japanese kana
symbols for syllables that are not composable
Alphabet - Latin, Hangul, &c.
Separate independant symbols for both consonants
and vowels
Mixed - Japanese and Korean
Other- English :)
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com