Re: Active languages
From: | Patrick Littell <puchitao@...> |
Date: | Friday, July 29, 2005, 18:33 |
On 7/29/05, Thomas Wier <trwier@...> wrote:
>
> Patrick Littell wrote:
> > They describe
> > Choctaw as having neither a passive nor an antipassive, and Lezgian
> > as having both. (Although Lezgian is sometimes described as ergative,
> > it's active by their definition of active.) Lezgian does not appear to
> > have a *morphological* passive or antipassive voice, though; it appears
> > to simply allow the agent or patient to go unexpressed.
>
> Do they run any of the standard tests for a change in grammatical
> relations? I ask, because just stating that arguments can go
> unexpressed is a pretty naive way to talk about voice systems.
The evidence for the existence of a voice , and it's one of the weaknesses
of this particular study that oblique arguments (which may be left out) and
unexpressed/absent arguments are treated identically: to wit, as abstract
case "C4".
> Only three active languages are considered in their somewhat small sample,
> > but they predict the following:
> >
> > No active language has a passive in which the patient takes NOM.
>
> Georgian is counterevidence to this, at least insofar as NOM can
> have any meany cross-linguistically.
Well, in the terminology of the paper, they call this case C1, and define it
for any given language as the case that the agent takes in an sentence
(usually the unmarked one) in which both agent and patient are of high
prominence. Since we were talking about active languages, I chose to render
C1 as NOM and C2 as ABS.
This definition, incidentally, has a bit of trouble with Phillipine-type
languages, in which it's tricky to say whether there's a "basic" transitive
sentence. Even Malagasy, which can be treated as a straightforward
accusative language, might have trouble with this approach. (Does one treat
genitive as an oblique case, or as the "basic" case of the agent, out of
which it moves to become topic?)
==========================================================================
> Thomas Wier "I find it useful to meet my subjects personally,
> Dept. of Linguistics because our secret police don't get it right
> University of Chicago half the time." -- octogenarian Sheikh Zayed of
> 1010 E. 59th Street Abu Dhabi, to a French reporter.
> Chicago, IL 60637
>
--
Patrick Littell
PHIL205: MWF 2:00-3:00, M 6:00-9:00
Voice Mail: ext 744
Spring 05 Office Hours: M 3:00-6:00