Re: New Language Sketch (was Re: Conlang Gender)
From: | Thomas R. Wier <artabanos@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, December 1, 1999, 3:11 |
Thomas R. Wier" wrote:
> Nik Taylor wrote:
>
> > nicole perrin wrote:
> > > abstract concepts, men, women, children, animals, other living things,
> > > fantasy-type creatures/things, inanimate objects
> >
> > This is a really odd hierarchy. Abstract concepts should probably be
> > just before inanimate objects. Human is usually the first item in a
> > hierarchy.
>
> I would think that abstract concepts should be last on the list, and that
> if you're going to have a separate category for them, you'd have them
> placed after inanimate objects.
Oops! That should be "and if you're going to have a separate category
for imaginary animals, then I'd have them placed after inanimate objects".
======================================
Tom Wier <artabanos@...>
ICQ#: 4315704 AIM: Deuterotom
Website: <http://www.angelfire.com/tx/eclectorium/>
"Cogito ergo sum, sed credo ergo ero."
======================================