Re: Keeping Track of Ambiguity in your Conlang?

Pavel Iosad scripsit:

> Um, I may be wrong here, but what I've learned is that this is called
> conversion and is essentially derivation by means of phonologically
> empty suffixes.
No, no, no, you've got it all wrong.   It's phonologically empty
*prefixes* that we use.  Two of them.

:-)

> But then, I'm not going to learn English at University - I'll be taking
> Swedish as my first language :-)
Count your blessings.

--
Some people open all the Windows;       John Cowan
wise wives welcome the spring           jcowan@reutershealth.com
by moving the Unix.                     http://www.reutershealth.com
  --ad for Unix Book Units (U.K.)       http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        (see http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/unix3image.gif)