Re: word derivation in sabyuka (some principles)

Julien Eychenne wrote:
(except 'r' because *sr is an illegal cluster which turns to 'sl'
>(just because I can't pronounce it !!!)).

Others have questioned this; no need for me to do so.  True, lots of
languages don't allow _sr_.  My favorite natlang, however, does (Leti,
eastern Indonesia) osri 'chase', pasra 'hit'; even one initial, srani
'Christian (a loan)'; all these result from vowel deletion.


>* from illegal *urru, that I can't pronounce :).
Interestingly, the sequence **/-lVr#/ > /-rnV#/ in Leti, but /-rrV#/ in
closely related Kisar (*telur(u) > L. ternu, K. kerra)


>'yol' "to cry" > 'yekol' "to rain"
>'teq' "to tell" > 'tekeq' "to sing"
>'mat' "to see" > 'mekat' "to desire"
>"dem" " to do" > 'dekem' "to build"

Nice.  In the first three, one can see that -ek- might mean "a special sort
of VERB"; perhaps a more precise gloss for mekat could be "to ogle"? or "to
covet"?
But dem/dekem looks more like a straightforward causative. Like Christophe
and Nik, I'd be curious to know how productive the infix is.

Replies