Re: Brithenig/Aelyan North America (was: Re: Languages in the Brithenig universe)
From: | andrew <hobbit@...> |
Date: | Friday, April 7, 2000, 10:57 |
Am 04/06 16:12 Matt Pearson yscrifef:
> Speaking as an interested outside observer, I think this whole issue of how the
> colonisation of the Americas could have remained limited should be given
> serious
> thought. What was it, specifically, which gave the indigenous peoples a
> fighting
> chance against encroaching Europeans in *that* universe, whereas they had
> almost no chance in *this* universe? I find it extremely implausible that the
> European colonists were simply more well-meaning and respectful of native
> peoples *there* than they were *here*.
>
I don't think that colonisation remained limited. All I know at this
stage is that we haven't got to the other side of *there* yet. The bear
hasn't climbed the mountain yet. The Brithenig Universe was never meant
to be a utopia - rather it is a reflection of ourselves.
I would like a better name than the Brithenig universe. That's turning
into just one part of a shared world of linguafictors. Any suggestions
for a proper name for the B.U.?
- andrew.
--
Andrew Smith, Intheologus hobbit@earthlight.co.nz
The sacred writers have clothed God in a human form, like gleaming
amber or fire, and have spoken of its eyes, and ears, and hair, and
face, and hands, and wings, and pinions, and arms, and back, and feet.
- The Divine Names, 1.8