Re: Making your language sound nice
From: | Michael Martin <masonheart@...> |
Date: | Sunday, June 15, 2008, 16:00 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Constructed Languages List
> [mailto:CONLANG@listserv.brown.edu] On Behalf Of Benct Philip Jonsson
> Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 8:23 AM
> To: CONLANG@listserv.brown.edu
> Subject: Re: Making your language sound nice
>
> On 2008-06-15 Michael Martin wrote:
> > My only concern is ending up with a modified > word
> that resembles some other word. Like if > "chalol" became
> "chalor" but there was already > a root word "chalor."
>
> Are you sure that homophony would be bad? If you want a
> 'logical' language without any ambiguity -- which AFAIK can
> only be approximated -- it probably is bad, but if you want a
> naturalistic language homophony might be good, as AFAIK all
> natlangs have homophones.
As I've said, my original idea was to avoid ambiguity, but the more I work
on this the more I difficult that seems to become. Also, my goals have
changed a bit. At first I was created this language just for the sake of
creating a language. But recently a friend and I have begun working on a
fantasy story and I thought of using this language in the story. So now
making it more "realistic" would make sense. Though I was still hoping to
make it sound nice.
... ..... .......
Michael D. Martin (AKA: Masonheart)
http://masonheart.blogspot.com/
Master Mason, S. W. Hackett #574
Free & Accepted Masons of California
http://www.calodges.org/no574/
... ..... .......
Reply