Re: CHAT: The Fabulous Personalities of Conlang
From: | Muke Tever <alrivera@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, June 4, 2002, 20:27 |
From: "Stephen DeGrace" <stevedegrace@...>
Okay...
> I have to confess to having gone through a period
> where I was fascinated with this theory and studied it
> to death :P. I still keep an interest, but like all my
> interests, it's a little fickle :). Anyways, what you
> want to do is try the test and then go to the second
> link and read the description for that type, and for
> the "neighboring" types. If a type seems to fit you
> well, then odds are it's right. If nothing seems to
> work, congrats, you're one of those people who make
> the theory go haywire, I know a number like that... :)
>
> Anyways, predictions, I'm betting all conlangers are
> Ns ::prepares to eat crow:: :),
Well I usually come out of these INFP, but today it does say I'm S. (with a
strength of 1%, which probably means it's not too significant compared to the
others, 44%, 33%, 44%)
And I read about both of them, seem pretty close.
*Muke!
--
http://www.frath.net/