Re: a grammar sketch...
From: | Yoon Ha Lee <yl112@...> |
Date: | Friday, September 29, 2000, 22:03 |
On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, John Cowan wrote:
> "H. S. Teoh" wrote:
>
> > > I visualize a cycle as a trinary tree (depth one) of 4
> > > trinary trees (of depth one)--a recursive structure. If I knew more
> > > about real linguistics I would probably be able to quote Chomsky or
> > > something at this point. :-(
> >
> > *waves sceptre of pedantry* That should be "ternary tree" not "trinary
> > tree" :-P *ducks*
>
> *swings Greatsword of Pedantry* "Trinary" and "ternary" are both acceptable.
(in a small voice) I've seen both, but "trinary" came to mind more
quickly because it rhymed with "binary."
YHL