| From: | Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Monday, May 14, 2007, 17:23 |
On 5/14/07, Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> wrote:> Mark J. Reed writes: > > I don't know what we call the case where there's no morphosyntactic > > distinction at all among the three roles. > > It was called 'clairvoyant' before in this list.That's it! I remembered someone calling it "neutral", but knew it had a snarkier nom du CONLANG. :) Danke! -- Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>
| Philip Newton <philip.newton@...> |