----- Original Message -----
From: "Christophe Grandsire" <christophe.grandsire@...>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 5:22 AM
Subject: Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
> En réponse à Joe <joe@...>:
>
> >
> > Well, Maggel got it's name from it's complex and it's apparently
> > random
> > orthography. I have to ask Christophe, though, is there an Old Maggel
> > in
> > which these words actually made sense?
> >
>
> Yes and no. There is a concept of an Old Maggel, of course, where the
> orthography would make sense. But that would be probably the language as
it was
> 1200 years ago ;)))) . And although there is this concept, I'm designing
Maggel
> synchronically, so Old Maggel doesn't really play a role. But if anyone is
> interested to reconstruct it based on orthographical evidence and
alternations,
> you're more than welcome ;))) .
I'd enjoy it ;-)
Do you have a Maggel Lexicon? I could develop it in reference to that.