Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Language and "mysticism," whatever that is.

From:jesse stephen bangs <jaspax@...>
Date:Sunday, April 29, 2001, 2:45
Sally Caves sikayal:

> Vyko, Conlangers!
Aiya! Vyko! Salut! Hi!
> I hope you haven't forgotten Teonaht!
Alas, I never knew Teonaht well. It's always fascinated me that apparently {ht} = [T] in Teonaht. I still tend to pronounce the name [te.o'naht] with emphatic [h] tending to [x].
> 1) How many of you old- and new-comers started inventing a language > in isolation from the list?
Me, just like most of the others. I was in 6th grade which means I was 11 or 12. Me and a friend each started our own conlangs at the same time, but we never worked on the same project. All along the language was intended for use in a fantasy world, but it had no other private use.
> 2) How many of you newcomers heard of the list first and thought-- > Wow! I think I'll try my hand at conlanging!
Not me. See above.
> 3) How many of you, when you were starting out on this on your own, > did this kind of thing: you have a list of words you want to invent > new ones for, so you drew di-and polysyllabic words out of the air.
I did this for a long, long time and still do it when I want to make a work for which I have no suitable root. I did keep bizarre, non-systematic similarities between related words giving, for example "pel, per, par" for "lip, tongue, speech" respectively.
> 4) If so, how important was it that the new word sound "exotic," > "beautiful," or > "suggestive" in some personal way of the word you wanted it to stand > for?
Utmost importance. As a personal artlang in addition to a fictional lang, it's always been very important that the words sound right.
> 5) How many of you invented words to express concepts that could not be > expressed in your native language?
I rarely do this, though I do have some words that I can't translate into English. I find that doing this on purpose gives the language an overloaded, unnatural feel.
> 6) How many of you used it for prayer? For secrecy?
Both, but neither very often.
> 7) For how many of you was it an intellectual exercise?
It was for me, in addition to being a personal lang and artlang and fictional lang, etc.
> 8) A language for a conculture?
Yes.
> 10) What is your definition of a mystical language? Would any of you > characterize your conlang as such?
I'd call a mystical language a language used primarily for religious purposes, i.e. prayer, incantations, etc. Latin was a mystical language throughout the middle ages. My conlang was never a mysical language for me, though in its conculture it *might* occasionally have that function. Jesse S. Bangs jaspax@u.washington.edu "If you look at a thing nine hundred and ninety-nine times, you are perfectly safe; if you look at it the thousandth time, you are in frightful danger of seeing it for the first time." --G.K. Chesterton

Reply

Henrik Theiling <theiling@...>