Eric Christopherson wrote:
> > No, {ch} is the mutated form of {c}, which I decided should
> > occur after the definite article. I'm still not sure if there
> > should be mutation or not after _i_ (sg) and _ir_ (pl).
> Is <ch> pronounced /x/ then, or /S/ or something?
For the moment I've decided to go for [x] in every
environments, tho /S/ is definitely a possibility.
> I'd assume that if /tSEjn/ comes from /kwenja/ then
> the result of /kwesse/ would be /tSEss/ <cess>.
Yes. Did I say otherwise?
> Can affricates undergo spirant mutation?
Yes, they become frex <ch> [x] or [S] as above.
||| daniel
--
<> Mad llamgalf! <> daniel.andreasson@telia.com <>
<> Ond llam! <> www.geocities.com/conlangus <>