Re: conlang classification and productivity
| From: | Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg.rhiemeier@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Wednesday, February 14, 2001, 23:08 |
|---|
dirk elzinga <dirk.elzinga@...> writes:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Jörg Rhiemeier wrote:
>
> > Well, my projects so far under the Legratec(TM) rating with an
> > additional P category for phonology and S for script:
> >
> > [snip]
>
> Okay. I lost track of this thread. What is a Legratec rating?
The Legratec rating is a system, proposed by Dan Jones if I am not
mistaken, of rating how well-developed a conlang is. The original
Legratec system has four categories:
L - lexicon
G - grammar
T - text corpus
C - conculture
The name "Legratec" is an acronym derived from these categories:
LExicon, GRAmmar, TExt corpus, Conculture.
I added two further categories:
P - phonology
S - script
In each category, the language is rated on a scale ranging from 0 (no
work yet done) to 5 (perfect and complete).
As can be told from the many 0's and 1's in my ratings, most of my
projects are/were very poorly developed ;-)
Jörg.
Replies