My conlang's Legratec rating (Was: Re: conlang classification and productivity)
From: | H. S. Teoh <hsteoh@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, February 14, 2001, 23:53 |
L = 1
G = 2
T = 0
C = 3
P = 4
S = 4
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:00:48AM +0100, J?rg Rhiemeier wrote:
[snip]
> The Legratec rating is a system, proposed by Dan Jones if I am not
> mistaken, of rating how well-developed a conlang is. The original
> Legratec system has four categories:
>
> L - lexicon
> G - grammar
> T - text corpus
> C - conculture
>
> The name "Legratec" is an acronym derived from these categories:
> LExicon, GRAmmar, TExt corpus, Conculture.
>
> I added two further categories:
>
> P - phonology
> S - script
>
> In each category, the language is rated on a scale ranging from 0 (no
> work yet done) to 5 (perfect and complete).
[snip]
T
--
Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's
character, give him power. -- Abraham Lincoln