Re: Ygyde as an IAL

On Friday 24 January 2003 02:58 pm, Andrew Nowicki wrote:
> Your texts do not follow grammatical rules of
> Ygyde and contain plenty of words that are not
> defined in the dictionary. I have no idea what
> your texts mean.
        At this point, we may conclude one of two things: a.) either Ygyde's taxonomy
system and roots have failed, or b.) a taxonomical system of word formation
provides no advantage to a language. If the creator of a taxonomical language
cannot guess what new words means, then certainly something is wrong
somewhere.
        As for grammar, ideally one should be able to understand the basic gist of
things without perfect grammar. For instance, I can say "Cat black yesterday
to house runned" and expect that someone paying close attention will be able
to understand that a black cat ran to or into a house yesterday.
        :Peter