Re: Conlangs on based Slavic languages...etc
From: | Tristan McLeay <zsau@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 1:52 |
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, John Cowan wrote:
> In the end, Hittite hasn't had that much of an effect on PIE, and most
> IE-ists simply use the null hypothesis that it is one more branch much
> like the rest. The cladistic work at UPenn, however, which is focused
> on finding binary branching points, does identify Hittite as maximally
> distinct from the other IE languages -- but the identification rests on
> a single characteristic.
I thought Hittite was supposed to maintain the older active:inactive
gender system and at least some of the laryngeals that no other IE
language did?
--
Tristan <kesuari@...>
Yesterday I was a dog. Today I'm a dog. Tomorrow I'll probably still
be a dog. Sigh! There's so little hope for advancement.
-- Snoopy
Reply