Re: question on sampa representation
| From: | Tri Stan <zsau@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, March 24, 2003, 1:54 |
|---|
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 06:10:41PM -0800, Joe wrote:
> [snip]
> > Ok. Well, [Q] is the rounded version of [A], which is a low back vowel.
> > And [O] is slightly higher than [Q]. Does that help?
>
> OK, so I think [A] is still what I think it is. *Phew*. :-P So [Q] and
> [O] are rounded versions of [A]...
No. [Q] is rounded [A]. [O] is rounded [V]. [Q] is on the same height as
[a]; [O] is on the same height as [E]. [O] is no more rounded [A] then [E]
is unrounded true [&].
Tristan
Reply