Re: planets

On the Conlang List, Ed Heil wrote:

> When I was a kid and into astronomy more than I am now, it was never
> a widely held theory that the moon was the result of a collision with
> another planet ripping a chunk out of the earth.
That is the standard theory now, except that *both* the Earth and the
Moon are the result of that collision.

> (ObConlang: Does your conlang have a verb which specifically
> describes massive asteroid impacts that rip a chunk off a planet and
> make it into a moon?
Sure: in Lojban, that would be lurborzbaplinyborpopkemcmaplinyjanli.
(c = /S/, j = /Z/, y = /@/, all else IPA; penultimate stress).

That analyzes to "(moon make) (planet break) ((small planet) collide)".

> Why or why not?)
Why? A consequence of Lojban's fully productive compounding rules.

--

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis vom dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@...>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)