Re: Analyzing Phonology
From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
Date: | Thursday, January 23, 2003, 12:23 |
En réponse à Nik Taylor <yonjuuni@...>:
>
> I'm working on resurrecting my oldest conlang, of which nearly all the
> grammar and about half the lexicon is missing. At any rate, I've had
> to
> make a few guesses as to what certain digraphs symbolized. Like,
> there's a distinction between _th_ and _thth_, which I *think* was
> intended to represent /T/ and /D/ respectively. Thus, I will replace
> _thth_ with _dh_. In addition, I've had to figure out the syllabic
> structure.
>
Resurrecting old conlangs of mine has been quite a hobby lately. It began
with "Roumant", which became Narbonósc, then came O (the language the notes
about which I had completely forgotten about and actually still can't
remember), and now Maggel ;))) . Must be linked to this curious trend in cinema
to produce only remakes of older successes or adaptation of old TV
series ;)))) .
Christophe.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.