Re: A wacky language
From: | Joe <joe@...> |
Date: | Friday, February 6, 2004, 17:45 |
Andreas Johansson wrote:
>Quoting Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>:
>
>
>
>>En réponse à Andreas Johansson :
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Your adpositions should be impositions (ie, go in the middle of the word).
>>>Plural should be indicated by reduplication of the preceding word, and
>>>
>>>
>>verbs
>>
>>
>>>should be discontinuous (ie, consist of 2+ separate bits that go in
>>>
>>>
>>different
>>
>>
>>>places in the sentence).
>>>
>>>
>>Well, German and Dutch already have that, and Maggel is planned to have
>>that too, so I'm not sure it's such a wacky feature (Maggel is a bit
>>wackier than Dutch and German as it separately conjugates both bits of the
>>verb :)) ).
>>
>>
>
>Well, if the German and Dutch auxilliary plus infinite main verb constructions
>count as discontinuous verbs, then this is found in every Germanic language.
>Seem to recall that Classical Latin also allows it. Or do you refer to
>particle verbs? That's also, I'm pretty sure, found throughout the Germanic
>family.
>
>
I assume he means verbs like 'aufstehen', etc. Are those particle verbs?
I don't think English has them, but I could be wrong.
Reply