Re: Esperanto film (was Re: Meta-History of Atlantean)
From: | And Rosta <a.rosta@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, July 17, 2001, 2:33 |
Matt:
> And Rosta wrote:
[...]
> > Do you know of any Burgess conlang dabbling apart from Nadsat and
> > the Quest for Fire? I don't, neither in his published works nor in
> > his nonliterary life. Yet I may have overlooked or forgotten something.
>
> Though I consider "A Clockwork Orange" to be a masterpiece, I do not
> otherwise care for Anthony Burgess's work very much. I find him too cold and
> cerebral, even for my academic tastes.
Whereas I find him to be bursting with vim, energy and moral and intellectual
passion. He's not the writer I admire most, or at least not the writer I
place at the acme of the art, but he's the one I feel the most fraternally
towards. And in my evidently rather charmed life to date, Burgess's death
caused me more grief than anyone else's has.
> But from what I've seen of his work,
> he seems to enjoy playing creatively with language--though much more in the
> tradition of Lewis Carroll or James Joyce than of Tolkien.
I agree. Like Nabokov, he's much more a glossophile than a conlanger.
--And.