Re: basic morphemes of a loglang
| From: | And Rosta <a.rosta@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Wednesday, November 26, 2003, 2:13 |
|---|
From: Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:18:42PM -0500, Paul Bennett wrote:
> > PS: You might find some resistence to talk of logical languages in these
> > parts, due to The Great Schism, but don't let it put you off from
looking
> > for answers.
>
> ? Did logical languages fall on the auxlang side of the schism, or was
> the schism more than bipartite?
>
> -Mark
Logical languages fell on the conlang side of the schism. But the
schism allowed artlangs to bloom on conlang, so much that the
dribs and drabs of loglanging were thoroughly drowned out. When
Conlang began, it was half loglangs and half auxlangs.
--And.