OT: Semi-OT: More on charsets
From: | Chris Palmer <cecibean@...> |
Date: | Sunday, January 20, 2002, 3:37 |
From nicole's signature:
> shmuli atae muhnkia-jiqek qelek nimmekel-Luddiga bl? apor-flauschige
> blaue Affen-t?difai k?wainG MANgKIWi-m?ndos ?zoros faffalos-khami
> zhaftami nuri xhan-jas?nni j??i jakih???i-Moncaithe gorma
> cl?mhacha-Monhyey ngonul hweyaru ryehyumeru-muncaidhean gorma
> molach-jhachtaraadkimyo-monos peludos azules-pushistye sinie
> obeżiany-z??nesfersaup s?l?raup b?fparaup-kędzierzawe [...]
Does this look right in anyone's mailer? It has >7b characters (which
got converted to ?s) in it and some HTML character entities, but my
mailer (Mutt 1.3.23i, dubiously compiled on OpenBSD) seems to have been
told it was ASCII. It's a shame it gets so mangled in transit, because I
want to see everyone's nifty orthographies and transliterations.
--
Chris www.nodewarrior.org/chris cecibean@bitstream.net
Reply