Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Featural Alphabets (was Re: Boustrophedon and Chinese (was Re: A single font can

From:tomhchappell <tomhchappell@...>
Date:Saturday, October 15, 2005, 17:25
--- In conlang@yahoogroups.com, Herman Miller <hmiller@I...> wrote:
> [snip] > I had a sort of "featural alphabet" before the list, but it was > cumbersome and I never really used it. I believe it was called > Atylat or > something like that. The Gargoyle alphabet from Ultima VI also has > featural elements (as much as Visible Speech or Tengwar, at least). > > I've had an interest in Visible Speech for a long time after seeing > an > exhibit in a museum in Canada, and at one time even did a > translation of > my home page: > > http://www.io.com/~hmiller/index-vs.html
I looked; turns out this computer can't display it.
> I don't know how accurate this is; it wasn't easy at the time to > find > information about Visible Speech. But VS was one of the > inspirations > that led me to develop the Tharkania and Ljörr writing systems. > You'll > probably need the Teamouse VS font to view this, unless you happen > to > have another Visible Speech font lying around. > > ftp://ftp.io.com/pub/usr/hmiller/fonts/tmousevs.ttf > > Francis Lodwick's "Essay towards an Universal Alphabet" (published > in > 1686, and mentioned in an article in Jim Allan's book _An > Introduction > to Elvish_) appears to be more or less a featural alphabet, as far > as > the consonants go. > > Here, I found a picture of it on an Italian web page: > > http://www.soronel.it/Universalfabeto.html
Thanks. I have saved this URL.
> But probably one of the most "featural" of scripts would be Otto > Jespersen's "Analphabetic Notation". Each phonetic sound is written > as > an unwieldy string of Greek letters, numerals, superscripts, and > symbols. Daniels and Bright's _The World's Writing Systems_ gives > the > example of [n], which is written as α„β0fγ„δ2εɪζ3 > (the "f" should be a > superscript).
That system is "featural", but not an "alphabet" (as, indeed, the name "Analphabetic Notation" would lead one to expect.) I don't "like" it (for present purposes) because I, too, find it "unwieldy". ----- Thanks for the three URLs. ----- Does anyone know, or has anyone been able to, apply Roman Jakobson's [1] original distinctive-feature set to Alexander Melville Bell's Visible Speech? [1] "Jakobson, Roman; Fant, Gunnar; & Halle, Morris. (1952). Preliminaries to speech analysis: The distinctive features and their correlates. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. " IIRC Jakobson's original 12-feature set was: Vocalic vs Non-Vocalic Consonantal vs Non-Consonantal Compact vs Diffuse Grave vs Acute Abrupt vs Continuous Strident vs Mellow Flat vs Plain Sharp vs Plain Voiced vs Mute Tense vs Lax Checked vs "Unchecked (?)" Nasal vs "Oral (?)" (non-Nasal) Tom H.C. in MI