Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Nouns from Verbs

From:Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>
Date:Saturday, June 14, 2003, 12:37
Quoting Rob Haden <magwich78@...>:

> Hello everyone, > > I was wondering what your methods are for deriving nouns from verbs. > More > specifically, how to derive instances of verbal activities from verbal > roots/stems -- i.e., "(a) kick" from "(to) kick".
Tairezazh don't have any consistent productive way to derive concrete nouns from verbal roots. However, many verbal roots have corresponding conrete nouns formed by the old nominalizer -stu. Examples include _kenist_ "a life" to _ken- _ "to live", _theist_ "a hope" to _theiz-_ "to hope", _blast_ "a war" to _melai-_ "to fight" and _grest_ "a thought" to _nerz-_ "to think". As should be obvious from the later two, the relationship is not always phonetically obvious. In addition, every verb root has a verbal noun form I refer to as the gerund, formed by the ending _-ent_. This is an abstract noun similar to English "- ing" forms. With the above roots we thus have _kenent_ "living", _theizent_ "hoping", _melaint_ "fighting" and _nerzent_ "thinking". Like for abstracts in many languages, such forms not infrequently concretify, especially when there is no other concrete noun with the appropriate meaning. A good example is _tsheint_ "loving, love" from _tshei-_ "to love", which covers both full abstract "love" and a concrete love for a specific person. Eg _Tsheint tsai zvats ne dhekreneints kenistener tain_ "Love gives our lives direction and motivation" (awfully romantic, innit?) vs _tsheint senar senoi_ "his love for her". There's also a couple of agental endings, the commonest being _-el_. With the above roots, we get _theizel_ "one who hopes", _melaiel_ "fighter_, _nerzel_ "thinker" and _tsheiel_ "lover". _Ken-_ appears not to give rise to any useful agental noun. Andreas PS _Melaiel_ and _tsheiel_ would, phonologically, be expected to reduce to **_melail_ and _tsheil_. They don't, however. It would appear that the forms with intact _e_ are backformations from after the _Vje_>_Vi ceased to operate, based on analogy with agentals where _-el_ is added to stems ending in consonants. For some reason, no similar process restored the _e_'s in _melaint_<_melajent_ and _tsheint_<_theijent_.