Re: substantive and noun
From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, September 18, 2002, 18:23 |
Christophe Grandsire writes:
> En réponse à Muke Tever <mktvr@...>:
>
> >
> > Huh! That is the opposite of what I learned. I learned that
> > "substantive" is
> > the subset of "noun":
> >
> > noun (L nomen, = name) substantive:
> > what we normally call nouns
> > noun adjective:
> > what we normally call adjectives
> > noun
> > substantives & adjectives together.
> >
>
> Once again a result of the strange terminology used by English-speaking
> countries. Internationally (it's the definition I learnt), the noun is a subset
> of the substantive, not the other way round, and while noun and adjective can
> be opposed, substantive put them together, and adds the pronouns to the mix.
>
> It's very common for instance to use the term substantive to refer to both
> nouns and adjectives in languages which don't separate them formally.
>
> Christophe.
>
Is it possible that the essential meaning of "substantive" is
orthogonal to the difference between nouns and adjectives (and certain
other parts of speech)?
I mean, may it be the case that the root meaning of substantive is the
ah, syntactic role, of heading a noun phrase? Nouns and adjectives
form one class, and they're substantives when they act like a noun,
and adjectives when they modify a substantive? I may be way off base
here, but I'm trying to piece this together.
Here's the beginning of Jäschke on the Tibetan adjective:
| 16. In the Tibetan langage the Adjective is not formally
| distinguished from the Substantive, so that many nouns may be used
| one or the other way just as circumstances require.
Later on he talks about substantive verbs, but I'm not yet clear what
he means by it.
Reply